A Silly Old Ass REPRINT

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

Image result for images of donkey's rear end

From May 18, 2019

We got a communication yesterday, unsolicited, from an alleged adult who says he’s “sick of rich old white men” running for president. We must note that he himself is a rich old white man.

Is it possible there are registered voters out there who really, truly think that skin color, sex, and age are important things to be considered, in choosing a president? I mean, does this guy even understand what a president is, and does? That “president” is a job–and that to do it well benefits the whole world, but to do it poorly can bring to large numbers of people hardship, frustration, loss, and even wounds and death.

As for being “rich,” let’s see… hmm… when was the last time an indigent was elected to high public office in America? [Riffles through history] Ooh-ooh–never! No poor homeless person has ever been elected to anything!

What we are hearing from, here, is a silly old ass who seems to think being “a woman of color” or something, or at least young and poverty-stricken, would by some weird alchemy make you a good president. It is a shame that he can vote. It can’t be a good thing to let utter chowderheads vote.

Heaven help us, if they ever again get to choose a president.

Chicago Values (You Gotta Be Kidding) REPRINT

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

From July 25, 2012

Once in a blue moon, a Democrat accidentally tells the truth. Chicago Mayor Rahm “Never let a good crisis go to waste” Emmanuel recently slipped up when he said, “Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values.”

He meant it, of course, as a slap at Chick-fil-A, whose owner has incurred the wrath of pwogwessives by supporting real marriage–a man and a woman–against same-sex pseudomarriage. For this thought crime, Democrat commissars of large cities like Chicago and Boston are determined to drive Chick-fil-A out of their cities. So now we know that man-and-woman marriage is not a Chicago value. Not that that should come as news to anyone.

Some of us crave fantasy because, quite simply, it’s better than reality. America’s leaders and their intellectual advisers are destroying her. It’s a sorry spectacle, and there seems to be very little we can do about it.

And so, from time to time, we sneak off to Narnia or Middle-Earth or (dare I say it?) Bell Mountain, and leave all those Chicago values behind. As a fantasy writer, I hope my creations provide my readers with a welcome respite from a world governed by Chicago values. And finally, if we can at least imagine a world in which Chicago values do not rule, then maybe we can find that elusive first step toward making the world we live in more like the one we can imagine.

A Word to Christians: Endure REPRINT

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

From March 29, 2013

I have never in my life seen anything as bizarre and chilling as the present decay of our civilization.

With immoralists driving both public policy and culture, they will lead people into behaviors that will cause national birth rates to crash and national economies to collapse. They have put us at risk of God’s judgment… but of course that’s only “Bible-thumping,” isn’t it?

We must remain faithful to God and to God’s word. We must endure.

Because, as the Bible teaches us (I Corinthians, Chapter 1), God uses weak things to overthrow the mighty, things that are despised to overthrow the things that are exalted, the foolishness of holiness to overthrow the suicidal wisdom of this world–and even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are.

Someday this age of calamities will be overpast. As sure as Christ is risen from the dead, this evil age will end. God already knows the exact day and the exact hour of its ending. If there is still a United States of America afterward, that will be a pleasant surprise.

Pray, and speak the truth.

We must endure.

 

Puppy Helps Injured Raccoon’s Rehab

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

Up From the Grave He Arose

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

No Wrap Up Today

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

Today I finally put out Lee’s handwritten manuscripts.  It was a lot harder on me than I thought it would be.  These are all for books that are already published and printed.  It was still hard, though.

Then I read how the Iranian conflict is spreading and escalating.  More countries are involved.  Russia is helping Iran and China is playing both sides of the fence.  No surprise there.

I am just out of gas and I will see you all tomorrow.

Pray for our troops.

God bless everybody

Patty

Adopting a Retired Racing Greyhound

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

This is a lovely girl who retired from a life of racing, then breeding.  Now she can just have fun in a loving home.

Arthur the Cat Who Talks All the Time

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

The UK’s Krazy Konservatives REPRINT

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

From January 12, 2015

Now, let’s see… Muslim jihad monsters are going around killing people, and after what they did in France last week, no one feels safe. So, how are European governments going to protect their people from being murdered?

Over in Britain, the Conservative Party has a swell idea. They plan to protect Brits from murderous Muslims by making it against the law to criticize murderous Muslims… and, for good measure, making it illegal to say anything against sodomite parodies of marriage ( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11202290/Sharia-law-or-gay-marriage-critics-would-be-branded-extremists-under-Tory-plans-atheists-and-Christians-warn.html ).

The proposed new hate speech law is so broad, so draconian, that Christians and atheists have finally found something they can agree on: This law must not be enacted.

Yes, I said Conservative. As in somewhere to the left of Sheila Jackson Lee, only not quite as lucid. Home Secretary Theresa May explained plans for “Extremism Disruption Orders” by which a judge could ban “extremists”–that is, anyone opposed to Sharia “law” or homosexual pseudomarriage–from broadcasting, public protest, “or even posting messages on Facebook or Twitter without permission.”

Permission? “Oh, Mr. Government, can I pretty please express my own opinions on my own Facebook page?” “No, you miserable extremist. Your opinions are not nice, and must not  be heard.” While they’re at it, why don’t they ban diary entries, too?

Says the Chancellor, George Osborne, Conservatives are fixing to “eliminate extremism in all its forms,” and–get this–curtail the activities of those who “spread hate but do not break laws.” What? You don’t have to break any laws, to have your freedom taken away? If you can wind up being punished without having broken any law, then your society is lawless.

What does the Conservative Party think it’s conserving? Don’t these people know they sound like Bill Ayers? In fact, they sound like those nuts in the Canadian “human rights” commissions who propose to ban “hate” altogether. Would we still be human if we could not hate? Meanwhile, to our British cousins, I’m sorry to say… This idiotic and insane proposal won’t protect you. And if you’ve got any sense, you’ll boot out the politicians who proposed it.